Evaluation and Validation of Different Integrated Pest Management Modules for Field Pea
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23910/1.2025.5877Keywords:
IPM, modules, field pea, Pisum sativum, insect-pestAbstract
This research was carried out during rabi (November-March) 2020–21 at Agronomy Instructional Farm, S. D. Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar, Gujarat, India to evaluate the efficacy of seven different Integrated Pest Management (IPM) modules against insect-pests of field pea. Five IPM modules were tested for their efficacy against insect-pest. The result revealed that the module M4 (Border crop with chickpea+treating seeds by imidacloprid 600FS @ 3 ml kg-1 seed+yellow sticky trap @one module-1+sprays of azadirachtin 1500 ppm @ 40 ml 10 l-1 water+HaNPV 250 LE @ 10 ml 10 l-1 of water+profenophos 50 EC @ 10 ml 10 l-1 water) exhibited significantly minimum population of 1.47 aphid 10 cm-1 shoot, 1.00 leafhopper trifoliate-1, 0.62 whitefly trifoliate-1, 0.08 larva plant-1 with lowest pod borer damage (0.30%) and thus proved to be most effective module which was at par with module M1. The highest field pea seed yield (1250 kg ha-1) was also harvested from module M4. The maximum (42.04%) increase in yield was obtained in the plots framed with M4 followed by module M1. The avoidable losses in field pea yield were minimum (9.36%) in module M1. The highest (`Rs. 87,500 ha-1) gross realization was obtained from the plots framed with module M4. The highest Protection Cost: Benefit Ratio (PCBR) was obtained in module M4 (1:3.56) which clearly indicated that module M4 was also the most economical module amongst all.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 J. V. Chauhan, Bindu K. Panickar, A. R. Prajapati, H. R. Gothi, B. M. Padhiyar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright. Articles published are made available as open access articles, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
This journal permits and encourages authors to share their submitted versions (preprints), accepted versions (postprints) and/or published versions (publisher versions) freely under the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license while providing bibliographic details that credit, if applicable.