Assessing Enteric Methane Emissions in Ruminants: A Comparative Study of the Green Feed Technique

Authors

  • Mangesh Vaidya Dept. of Veterinary Physiology, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Akola, Maharashtra Animal & Fishery Sciences University, Nagpur, Maharashtra (440 006), India https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8655-6015
  • V. R. Patodkar Dept. of Veterinary Physiology, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Akola, Maharashtra Animal & Fishery Sciences University, Nagpur, Maharashtra (440 006), India
  • Prajakta Kuralkar Dept. of Veterinary Physiology, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Akola, Maharashtra Animal & Fishery Sciences University, Nagpur, Maharashtra (440 006), India
  • Suhas Amrutkar Dept. of Animal Nutrition, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Akola, Maharashtra Animal & Fishery Sciences University, Nagpur, Maharashtra (440 006), India
  • Girish Panchbhai Dept. of Livestock Production and Management, 5Dept. of Veterinary Biochemistry, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Akola, Maharashtra Animal & Fishery Sciences University, Nagpur, Maharashtra (440 006), India
  • Mahesh Gupta Dept. of Veterinary Physiology, Nagpur Veterinary College, Nagpur, Maharashtra Animal & Fishery Sciences University, Nagpur, Maharashtra (440 006), India
  • Prashant Kapale Dept. of Veterinary Biochemistry, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Akola, Maharashtra Animal & Fishery Sciences University, Nagpur, Maharashtra (440 006), India
  • S. V. Singh Dept. of Animal Physiology, ICAR, National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal Haryana (132 001), India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23910/1.2025.5970

Keywords:

Green feed, methane, heat stress, ruminants, feed additives

Abstract

Livestock-generated methane, particularly from cattle, was a significant contributor to climate change. Methane emissions from ruminant animals, such as cows and sheep, are primarily caused by the microbial fermentation of food in their digestive systems, a process known as enteric fermentation by making this process a prime source of greenhouse gas emissions in animal production. Considerable knowledge gaps existed in animal agriculture regarding effective strategies for mitigating these emissions while maintaining productivity. A key factor was the uncertainty surrounding methods for estimating emission rates, each having inherent limitations. For example, the suitability of the GreenFeed system varied based on specific experiment objectives. Compared to respiration chambers and the sulfur hexafluoride tracer method, the The GreenFeed system often required more time and a larger number of animals for treatment comparisons due to higher within-day variances. It measured numerous short-term methane emissions from individual animals at various times throughout the day over several days. Recent advancements focused on improving accuracy, ease of use, and cost-effectiveness, essential for better monitoring of greenhouse gases. Traditional methods, such as respiration chambers, while accurate, were costly and impractical for field measurements. The GreenFeed system’s software facilitated control over feed availability timing and CH4 measurement allocation. Therefore, careful planning was necessary to ensure accurate estimates of methane production. This review emphasized the need for effective measurement techniques to mitigate methane emissions from livestock.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-07

How to Cite

1.
Vaidya M, Patodkar VR, Kuralkar P, Amrutkar S, Panchbhai G, Gupta M, et al. Assessing Enteric Methane Emissions in Ruminants: A Comparative Study of the Green Feed Technique. IJBSM [Internet]. 2025 Mar. 7 [cited 2025 Sep. 20];16(Mar, 3):01-9. Available from: https://ojs.pphouse.org/index.php/IJBSM/article/view/5970

Issue

Section

Articles