Management and Socio-economic Aspects of Livestock Farming in Flood-prone Areas of Cuddalore District

Authors

  • P. Silambarasan Dept. of Livestock Production Management Veterinary College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (TANUVAS), Orathanadu, Tamil Nadu (614 625), India https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1441-3848
  • T. T. Vannan Dept. of Livestock Production Management, Madras Veterinary College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu (600 007), India
  • Richard Churchil Dept. of Poultry Science, Madras Veterinary College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu (600 007), India
  • N. Vengadabady Training and Research Centre, TANUVAS, Cuddalore, Cuddalore, Tamil Nadu (607 001), India
  • K. P. Saravanan Training and Research Centre, TANUVAS, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu (613 403), India
  • M. S. Kannadhasan Veterinary College and Research Institute, TANUVAS, Veerapandi, Theni, Tamil Nadu (625 534), India
  • S. Vasudevan Dept. of Earth Sciences, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, Tamil Nadu (608 002), India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23910/1.2025.6685

Keywords:

Flood disaster, livestock, housing, feeding, socio-economic profile, Cuddalore

Abstract

A detailed survey was conducted from September, 2020 to February, 2021 to document the socio-economic status and livestockrearing practices in the flood-prone areas of Cuddalore district. This study assessed the socio-economic profile, livestock holdings, housing practices, stocking density, and feeding management of livestock farmers in flood-prone areas of Cuddalore district, Tamil Nadu. Floods, among the major natural disasters affecting agriculture and livestock-based livelihoods in coastal regions of India. A total of 600 households (20 villages×30 farmers) were surveyed across three Geographical Areas (GGA I: 0–10 m, GGA II: 11–20 m, GGA III: >20 m above mean sea level). Results revealed a predominance of male farmers (63.83%) with an overall literacy rate of 64.48%, lower than the district average. Most farmers were daily wage labourers (65.17%) and had landholdings below one acre, with 33% landless. Thatched-roof housing was the most common (49.17%), and a significant proportion of farmers (40.16%) lacked any animal shelter. Livestock holdings were generally small, with non-descriptive cattle and goats predominating, and significant variations were observed in crossbred cow, goat, and sheep numbers across GGAs. The mean number of animals shed-1 ranged from 9.67 to 12.27, with higher stocking densities in GGA II. Regular concentrate feeding averaged 1.20 kg day-1, increasing to 3.81 kg day-1 after floods to support recovery. The study highlighted that low literacy, small landholdings, and limited infrastructure constrained adaptive capacity among livestock farmers. These findings underscored the need for targeted extension services, flood-resilient animal housing, and improved feeding strategies to enhance livestock resilience in flood-prone areas.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-17

How to Cite

1.
Silambarasan P, Vannan TT, Churchil R, Vengadabady N, Saravanan KP, Kannadhasan MS, et al. Management and Socio-economic Aspects of Livestock Farming in Flood-prone Areas of Cuddalore District. IJBSM [Internet]. 2025 Dec. 17 [cited 2026 Jan. 10];16(Dec, 12):01-1. Available from: https://ojs.pphouse.org/index.php/IJBSM/article/view/6685

Issue

Section

Articles