Exploring the Relative Economics of Tobacco and its Major Competing Crops – A Study in the Terai Region of West Bengal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23910/1.2026.6898Keywords:
Tobacco, economics, perceived reasons for continuance, market malfunctioningAbstract
This present study was conducted during the months of January–August, 2023 under the Department of Agricultural Economics, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Pundibari, Cooch Behar, India to explore the reasons behind the persistence and rising trend of tobacco cultivation despite the implementation of multiple tobacco control laws in India. By adopting the technique of multi-stage random sampling, the researchers drew 72 samples of farmer respondents in the Cooch Behar district of West Bengal. The study aimed to elucidate a clue to the core question, ‘why did farmers persist in cultivating tobacco despite the enactment of tobacco-related laws and awareness campaigns of its harmful effects?’ Standard statistical/economic tools and concepts were used to address the study’s diverse objectives. Maize and potato were found to be the two most prominent competing crops of tobacco during the rabi season. Our study proved the superiority of the two most popular cultivars of tobacco, i.e., Jati and Motihari, over the competing crops in terms of cost of cultivation, net return, cost of production, etc. Return per rupee (in terms of Cost A1) happens to be 4.76 and 4.70 for Jati and Motihari tobacco, which is substantially higher than that of maize (2.56) and potato (2.70). The study’s outcome indicated that farmers prefer tobacco cultivation due to its greater profitability, established market demand for tobacco products, simplicity and ease of cultivation, and other favorable factors. Also, compared to other crops, tobacco growers experienced fewer instances of market malfunction in the study area.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Shouvik Kar, Soumyadeep Das, Rahul Ashad, Kalyan Kanti Das

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright. Articles published are made available as open access articles, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. 
This journal permits and encourages authors to share their submitted versions (preprints), accepted versions (postprints) and/or published versions (publisher versions) freely under the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license while providing bibliographic details that credit, if applicable.

