Weed Management Strategies in Soybean: Assessing the Influence of Integrated Nutrient and Weed Management on Weed Dynamics and Dry Weight

Authors

  • Rathod Sridhar Dept. of Agronomy, School of Agricultural Sciences, Nagaland University, Nagaland (797 106), India
  • L. T. Longkumer Dept. of Agronomy, School of Agricultural Sciences, Nagaland University, Nagaland (797 106), India
  • A. P. Singh Dept. of Agriculture, School of Agriculture and Development, Central University of South Bihar, Gaya, Bihar (824 236), India
  • T. Gohain Dept. of Agronomy, School of Agricultural Sciences, Nagaland University, Nagaland (797 106), India
  • G. Zion Dept. of Agronomy, School of Agricultural Sciences, Nagaland University, Nagaland (797 106), India
  • N. Kikon Dept. of Agronomy, School of Agricultural Sciences, Nagaland University, Nagaland (797 106), India
  • I. Ao Dept. of Horticulture, School of Agricultural Sciences, Nagaland University, Nagaland (797 106), India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23910/2/2025.6295a

Keywords:

Soybean, integrated weed management, nutrient, pendimethalin, imazethapyr, weed

Abstract

A field investigation was conducted during the kharif seasons (July to October) of 2023 and 2024 at the Agronomy Farm, School of Agricultural Sciences, Nagaland University, Medziphema campus, Nagaland, India, to evaluate the effect of integrated nutrient and weed management on weed dynamics and weed dry matter in soybean (Glycine max L.). The experiment was laid out in a randomized block design (RBD) with three replications comprising four nutrient management treatments and four weed management practices. The pooled results revealed that 50% RDF+FYM @ 6 t ha-1+PSB @ 20 g kg-1 seed (N3) recorded reduced total weed density (79.0 plants m-2) and dry matter accumulation (6.70 g m-2) at 30 DAS. The sequential application of Pendimethalin @ 750 g ha-1 (PE) followed by Imazethapyr @ 75 g ha-1 (PoE) (W4) significantly lowered weed density and dry weight at all crop stages, with weed control efficiency (WCE) of 69.7%, 94.6%, and 95.6% at 15, 30, and 45 DAS, respectively. It was followed by Imazethapyr @ 75 g ha-1 (PE)+ one hand weeding at 25 DAS (W2), which also showed effective control and high WCE values (up to 93.8%). Nutrient treatments had non-significant effects on weed parameters but contributed indirectly to weed suppression via enhanced crop growth. Interaction effects (N×W) were statistically non-significant. The study confirms that sequential herbicide applications along with partial organic nutrient sources offer a sustainable approach to weed control and soil fertility improvement in rainfed soybean.

Downloads

Published

31-07-2025

How to Cite

Sridhar, R., Longkumer, L. T., Singh, A. P., Gohain, T., Zion, G., Kikon, N., & Ao, I. (2025). Weed Management Strategies in Soybean: Assessing the Influence of Integrated Nutrient and Weed Management on Weed Dynamics and Dry Weight. International Journal of Economic Plants, 12(July, 4), 01–07. https://doi.org/10.23910/2/2025.6295a

Issue

Section

Articles